Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us

Richard Carrier - Deceitful or Just Plain Dumb?

1/30/2014

10 Comments

 
Picture
When I read Carrier’s article for yesterday’s review, I really could not tell if his errors were the result of ignorance or intent.  For this article, however, I have to assume that he is intentionally twisting the facts, for the level of ignorance required for the first option is simply unthinkable in a man with a PhD in the field of history.  Let me show you what I mean.

Carrier’s “best proof” that the founders did not rely on the Bible in formulating our system of government comes from a paragraph in the preface to John Adams’ Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America.  Carrier quoted Adams as saying that:

The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature, and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. ... It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had any interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the inspiration of heaven, any more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture. It will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.

Carrier claims that this statement is “a direct denouncement of the Law of Moses” because that Law was the result of inspiration from heaven, but Adams was not claiming to have ignored all documents claiming to have been produced by inspiration.  He was simply acknowledging that none of the founders were claiming to have been personally inspired by God as was typical of the rulers of the past.  As we saw yesterday, even in Solon’s Athens, the king was the high-priest of the land, and to continue that thought, Adams also said of Athens that:

Nobility, as well as royalty, was believed of divine right, because the gods and goddesses had condescended to familiar intercourse with women and men, on purpose to beget persons of a superior order to rule among nations.

Thus, when Adams spoke of not pretending to be “in any degree under the inspiration of heaven,” he was actually denouncing the philosophy of Solon’s Athens.  Carrier completely ignores this and speaks as if Adams saw Athens as some grand utopia of democracy.  In reality, Adams viewed Athens (and Solon as well) as miserable failures.  It’s true that Adams recognized that Solon had several good ideas, but he also noted that when it came time to put these ideas into practice, Solon’s system was shown to be unstable.

What’s more interesting than this, however, is the way in which Carrier handled the end of Adams’ paragraph about not being under the inspiration of heaven.  Adams concluded that point with this statement:

The experiment is made, and has completely succeeded; it can no longer be called in question, whether authority in magistrates and obedience of citizens can be grounded on reason, morality, and the Christian religion, without the monkery of priests, or the knavery of politicians.

This was how John Adams ended his claim that America was founded on the simple principles of nature.  According to Adams, the whole American experiment was to see if laws for authority and obedience could be founded solely on reason, morality and the Christian religion.  This was the American experiment, and Adams viewed it as being successful.  But look at the way that Carrier refers to this line from Adams:

Adams does also say that “morality and the Christian religion, without the monkery of priests” has helped to sustain America’s success, but he never once credits any specific principle from that religion (like the Ten Commandments) as lying at the foundation of the American Constitution. That idea isn’t even considered. (emphasis in original)

Do you see the difference?  According to Carrier, Adams viewed Christianity as something which helped to “sustain America’s success.”  But according to Adams himself, Christianity was one of the foundations on which the entire American experiment was grounded.  Carrier has taken a statement which directly refutes his claim, twisted it into saying something else entirely and presented it as evidence that he is right.  As I said before, the level of ignorance required for this to have been a mere misunderstanding is unfathomable.  And yet, it gets even worse.

As part of his claim that Adams did not consult the writings of Moses, Carrier cited a list of the authors that Adams quoted from in his Defence, and he pointed out that “Moses is conspicuous for his absence.”  Of course, Solon was absent from that list as well since none of his writings were available to Adams, but Carrier notes that “Solon, of course (and in contrast), would be represented most significantly in the writings of Aristotle.”  I have no problem with this; Adams certainly obtained some of his information on Solon from the writings of Aristotle, but if Solon can be represented second-hand, why can’t Moses be found in Adams' book in the same way?

Carrier identified Algernon Sydney as being one of the writers that Adams quoted, but he completely ignored the fact that part of what Adams quoted Sydney as saying was:

And if I should undertake to say, there never was a good government in the world, that did not consist of the three simple species of monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy, I think I may make it good.  This at the least is certain, that the government of the Hebrews, instituted by God, had a judge, the great Sanhedrim, and general assemblies of the people.

WAIT!!! STOP THE PRESSES!!!  Did Adams just reference the divinely inspired Law of Moses?  Why, yes.  Indeed he did, or at least, he quoted someone else in a favorable light who did so.  And that’s not all. 

One of the other names on the list was James Harrington who was renowned for his studies of the Law of Moses.  In fact, the second volume of his work The Art of Lawgiving was entitled “Containing the Commonwealths of the Hebrews; Namely, Elohim, Or the Commonwealth of Israel; and Cabala, Or the Commonwealth of the Jews.”  And in another of Harrington’s books, The Commonwealth of Oceana, he claimed that the Greeks and Romans attempted to implement the same principles of government which were “first discovered to mankind by God himself in the fabric of the commonwealth of Israel.”  Adams quoted from Harrington extensively and even included the statement that:

This kind of law, fixing the balance in lands, is called Agrarian, and was first introduced by God himself, who divided the land of Canaan to his people by lot.

This gives us at least two instances in which Adams favorably quoted statements about the Law of Moses in regards to crucial points of the American legal system.  The first was in regards to the three branches of government and the second in regards to the agrarian origin of private property rights.  Carrier claims that Adams made “No mention of Moses,” but here we see two very important references to him which prove that Carrier is either insanely ignorant of his subject matter, or he is intentionally deceiving his readers. 

As long as this article already is, I cannot close it without offering this parting shot across Carrier’s bow.  If you recall, the primary claim that Carrier was attempting to prove was that the founders did not base our legal system upon the Ten Commandments of the Bible.  In his effort to do so, it was Carrier who suggested that we search for any reference to these Commandments in John Adams’ Defence of the Constitutions of the United States of America.  We have seen that, in that book, Adams was critical of Solon, and he spoke favorably of the Law of Moses.  But the clearest example of Carrier’s error is found in the fact that Adams actually mentions the Ten Commandments themselves in this book.  In the fourth chapter, Adams wrote the following:

If, as Harrington says, the ten commandments were voted by the people of Israel, and have been enacted as laws by all other nations; and if we should presume to say, that nations had a civil right to repeal them, no nation would think proper to repeal the fifth, which enjoins honor to parents.

Here we have Adams recognizing the probability that the Ten Commandments were adopted by Israel through a popular vote, that those same Commandments have been part of the foundation of all other legal codes, and that it would be presumptuous to say that any nation had a right to repeal those Commandments.  In short, this one sentence, from the very source that Carrier recommends, disproves everything that Carrier sought to establish about the founding of our great nation. 

10 Comments
Jason
1/30/2014 12:45:12 pm

I know they say, "don't attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity," but I'm afraid I'm at a loss to explain how Carrier could be this dumb.

Perhaps he is deceitful.

Reply
edwardtbabinski
2/4/2014 03:01:47 am

The question for Christian apologists should not be, "Look, Carrier made an error," but, "Can we prove the divine inspiration of either the Ten Commandments or any biblical writings and laws?"

I am content with the fact that freethinkers and deists played a visible and significant role in the founding of the U.S., even in the earliest anti-slavery societies (of which Franklin and Paine, and Quakers, whom the other Christians regarded as "heretics," played significant roles), regardless of whatever additional roles were played by "Moses and the Ten Commandments."

I am content that the founders ratified a First Amendment and Bill of Rights that includes, "Freedom of religion and speech," RATHER THAN, a First Commandment that says, "No other God's before me" [under penalty of death] including laws against blasphemy and taking the Lord's name in vain.

I am content with John Adams being a devout Unitarian, i.e., a "Christian religion" that did not preach the doctrines of predestination, original sin, or the full divinity of Christ. Rather, he emphasized the importance of reason and morality in religious life, and that he remonstrated against religious intolerance In a letter to Thomas Jefferson in which he wrote:

"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!"

In his letter to Samuel Miller, 8 July 1820, Adams admitted his unbelief of Protestant Calvinism: "I must acknowledge that I cannot class myself under that denomination."

In his, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" [1787-1788], John Adams wrote:

"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.

". . . Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

Reply
Bill Fortenberry
2/14/2014 08:31:50 am

Edward,

There is much that I could say in response to your comments, but a friend of mine, W. R. Miller has graciously offered to answer in my stead. You can find a point by point response to everything that you wrote by copying and pasting this link: http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/2014/02/when-skeptics-ignore-history.html

Reply
Edwardtbabinski link
2/17/2020 01:21:25 am

Been a long time Bill, Thanks for pointing me to that attempted rebuttal.

For Adams his religion was as he said and as quoted in the rebuttal, “The Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount.” He was a Unitarian who believed in God but he emphasized doing right rather than believing orthodox doctrines about Jesus and the Trinity, etc. According to Adams’s own words as cited by the person attempting to rebut what I wrote, “All good men are Christians.” Simply believing in God and doing right was “Christianity” according to Adams. Pretty simple. Jesus in the synoptic Gospels likewise emphasized that one inherited eternal life via heeding his words to do right as in the Sermon on the Mount, just as Jesus likewise told others who asked him how they might inherit eternal life when they asked, and they asked fairly frequently in the synoptic Gospels. Pretty simple.

https://edwardtbabinski.us/scrivenings/2016/christian-theology-is-all-over-map-part_24.html

As for your own views vis a vis Franklin being a true Christian, I composed a rebuttal a while back. Of course some a Christians find your own definition of Christianity a bit controversial.

https://edward-t-babinski.blogspot.com/2016/10/was-benjamin-franklin-christian-or-to.html

W. R. Miller
11/4/2022 12:21:29 pm

What a shame. The essay already addressed Babinski’s point about President Adams’ Unitarian position. Pretty simple. But apparently not simple enough for Babinski to comprehend. So he demonstrates Argument from ignorance. A logical fallacy.
“Attempted rebuttal.” Argument from wishful thinking. A logical fallacy. My rebuttal was not refuted.
Babinski links to an essay that has nothing to do with the topic of Carrier’s argument vis-à-vis
Adams. Argument by red herring. A logical fallacy.
In Babinski’s essay, neither he nor the pundits he cites indicate any understanding of the science of jurisprudence in the evaluation of history. Fallacious appeal to authority. Another logical fallacy.
Considering Babinski’s dependence on logical fallacies, what does that indicate about his credibility--or lack thereof?

Andrew
2/10/2014 11:22:49 am

"Here we have Adams recognizing the probability that the Ten Commandments were adopted by Israel through a popular vote..."

Are you serious? Exactly where in the Bible does it say that the Ten Commandments were put up for a vote? Chapter and verse please.

Reply
Bill Fortenberry
2/10/2014 02:53:03 pm

Thank you for commenting, Andrew. If you'll notice, Adams cited James Harrington as the one who said that the Ten Commandments were voted on by the Israelites. Harrington's study of the government of Israel can be found in volume two of his book "The Art of Lawgiving" which I linked to in the article. However, I conducted my own study of Scripture before reading Harrington's work, and I also arrived at the conclusion that God offered up His Law for a vote by the people of Israel. I published my conclusions in an article entitled "We the People: The Biblical Precedent for Popular Sovereignty," and it is available to be read online at: http://www.increasinglearning.com/we-the-people.html

Reply
Nick Peters link
2/17/2014 06:49:03 am

I keep looking forward to the day when the atheistic community will be thoroughly embarrassed even more for putting all their eggs into the Carrier basket, including this Christ-myth nonsense. Carrier just has an incredible hubris about himself and his abilities in everything and unfortunately, the atheist community is just feeding and stroking it.

Reply
Jonathan Richards
5/29/2017 05:12:56 pm

Apparently, you're still waiting. And we are still enjoying the expose and fraud revealed by Carrier (and many others) that has been perpetuated upon the world. The only "nonsense" here is the fanatical, unfounded belief in the mystical, magical and invisible.

Reply
lenny cruz
3/14/2015 11:20:59 am

His latest book on christ myth is peer reviewed.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    The KJV
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us