Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us

A Short Debate on The Moral Argument for the Existence of God

5/14/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
One of the main reasons that I engage in political debates is that doings so creates so many opportunities for directing the conversation to the topics of God and the Bible.  Here's a recent example of a comment that someone left on one of my political posts which then grew into a debate on the moral argument for the existence of God. 
John:  Can anybody point to god actually ever doing anything? Existing, for example?

Bill:  Sure. God established what is right and what is wrong. Of course, I'm sure that you would disagree with that statement, so let me ask in advance -- What do you see as the foundation for what is right and what is wrong?

John: No, men established those things. And men share basic mores with each other.

Bill:  So does that mean that since men established what is right and what is wrong men can also change what is right and what is wrong? For example, if men decided that slavery is right, would that actually make slavery right?

John:  Yes, bill, which is exactly how slavery was done away with.

Bill:  Was slavery something wrong that needed to be done away with?

John:  Yes, bill.

Bill:  If men determine what is right and what is wrong, then how could slavery have been wrong when the men who practiced it thought that it was right?

John:  That's pretty ridiculous there bill. You're arguing in circles because you know you don't have a point. Show verifiable, reproducible proof or leave it alone.

Bill:  I'm just trying to follow your logic, here. You say that slavery was actually wrong when it was practiced by men and a society that said that it was right. Yet, you also say that it is men who determine what is right and what is wrong. If men decide what is right and what is wrong, then when the men of the past decided that slavery was right, that should have meant that slavery was right. How can you say that the slavery practiced in former days was actually wrong?

John:  Proof, bill, proof, not circular logic. Your responses are proving my point.

Bill:  John, it's your own argument that is circular. I'm just repeating what you said, and you have rightly noted that it goes in a circle. Therefore, your claim that men determine what is right and what is wrong is logically invalid.

My claim, however, is that God is the one who determines what is right and what is wrong, and that claim is based on the following logically sound argument:

1. If God does not exist, objective moral values do not exist.
2. Objective moral values do exist.
3. Therefore, God exists.

John:  Moral values have no need of a god to exist. Man is perfectly capable of recognizing good and evil on his own. You have not still presented one iota of verifiable proof that a god exists. What's worse, you cannot offer that proof. You need an imaginary friend to justify your actions, fine. Rational people dont. Science and thought direct us and our values. But thanks for playing.

Bill:  John, my evidence is that there are objective moral values. You have essentially admitted this evidence to be true by claiming that slavery is actually wrong even if a society decrees that it is right. You also admit the existence of objective moral values when you claim that man can recognize those values through the use of science. Man can only recognize right and wrong through science if right and wrong are real, objective values instead of subjective determinations of men. Do you agree that objective moral values exist?

John:  The existence of morals are nothing more than the learned behaviors of organisms living together in a beneficial society. They are NOT proof of your god. There is no verifiable proof of his existance. If moral values are the best you've got, then you've got nothing. Give me concrete scientific proof. And you can't do that. The is no god. Period.

Bill:  If morals are nothing more than learned behaviors, then that necessarily means that things like slavery, rape, murder and theft are not really bad after all. If we were to train children to think that these were good and not bad, then for those children, all these things actually would be good. Do you think that slavery would be good if we were all taught that it was? I'm sure that you do not. Therefore, if slavery is actually wrong regardless of whether men are taught that it is right, then slavery must be objectively wrong, and since there are objective moral values, there must be a God in whom those values are grounded.

This is basic philosophy. It's why all the atheist philosophers of previous generations consistently and without fail either ceased being atheists or completely rejected the concept of morality at all. This is why Anthony Flew became a theist and why Richard Dawkins has denied the very existence of morality. Real morality (where things actually are right or wrong) cannot exist unless God exists.
1 Comment
Jenelle
5/26/2022 10:04:22 am

It's a very good argument. He was very much in denial of his own circular reasoning, though I believe he like many others I've seen recognize their flaw but deliberately ignore it and choose to pretend theists are the flawed ones.

A point I've given to my own husband when we talk about atheists is that the mere idea of a deity proves there's a deity.

How is that? Because we cannot think of anything that does not already exist or the parts that exist to create that "new" thing. For example: the idea of the microwave, the kitchen tool, was thought of because of pre-existing microwaves and the ability to heat things. Anything we think of either exists or can be manipulated by our thoughts into an invention because of the things that exist. Atheists would have us believe that God is the exception.

If God did not exist, then what on earth would give man such an idea of an all powerful, all controlling entity when man and existing materials do not display such ability? We cannot even manipulate the existence of God because there's literally nothing in this universe, including ourselves, that has the attributes of God and therefore we couldn't attribute such attributes we've never observed, because we wouldn't know about them. Where does man come up with the idea to try and be all powerful and all controlling, if he did not first have an example of something or Someone else Who has already done so and is so?

Man does not just pull up ideas out of nowhere. Every idea is backed by the existence of materials or the observances of things that have happened by another source.

Give it a try. Try and think of something that does not exist without using current existing materials or what you can observe through science and then pick a name for it and describe it. Remember, your description cannot describe anything that can already be observed in other sources or is made with other currently existing sources.

My husband doesn't understand my point, maybe you won't either. This argument may only make sense to me. But it's an argument that just further cements my faith in God and in His Son Jesus Christ.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

You can help support Increasing Learning by browsing through our Red Bubble store. 
We offer a unique blend of spiritual, witty, nostalgic, and just plain fun designs.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us