Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us

John Adams was not a "Theistic Rationalist - Part 3

1/8/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Frazer’s third error in his chapter on Adams follows hard on the heels of his first two errors.  In fact, his first three errors are all in the same paragraph regarding Adams’ beliefs about the Creator.  To conclude that paragraph, Frazer wrote:
Occasionally, his references to the creator God were less than personal. For example, after making the case that what some call fate is God, he asked, “Why, then, should we abhor the word God, and fall in love with the word fate? We know there exists energy and intellect enough to produce such a world as this.” In a discussion of the afterlife, Adams said, “The Maker of the Universe, the cause of all things, whether we call it [emphasis mine] fate, or chance, or GOD, has inspired this hope.”

In this statement, Frazer has excerpted two brief sentences out of a single series of letters between Adams and Jefferson.  In this particular series of letters, Adams and Jefferson were discussing some of the major flaws in the writings of the French philosophes.  These French philosophes were in favor of eliminating all references to God in society and replacing those references with more generic words like “fate.”  Adams’ question “Why then should we abhor [hate] the word God, and fall in love with the word fate?” came at the end of several paragraphs in which he mocked and ridiculed the philosophes who were promoting this idea.


No Man is more Sensible than I am, of the Service to Science and Letters, Humanity, Fraternity, and Liberty, that would have been rendered by the Encyclopedists and Œconomists, By Voltaire, D’Alembert, Buffon Diderot, Rouseau La Lande, Frederick and Catharine, if they had posessed Common Sense. But they were all totally destitute of it. They all Seemed to think that all Christendom was convinced as they were, that all Religion was “Visions Judaicques” and that their effulgent Lights had illuminated all the World. They Seemed to believe, that whole Nations and Continents had been changed in their Principles Opinions Habits and Feelings by the Sovereign Grace of their Almighty Philosophy, almost as Suddenly as Catholicks and Calvinists believe in instantaneous conversion. They had not considered the force of early Education on the Millions of Minds who had never heared of their Philosophy.
 
And what was their Phylosophy? Atheism; pure unadulterated Atheism. Diderot, D’Alembert, Frederick, De Lalande and Grimm were indubitable Atheists. The Universe was Matter only and eternal; Spirit was a word without a meaning; Liberty was a word without a Meaning. There was no Liberty in the Universe; Liberty was a word void of Sense. Every thought word Passion Sentiment Feeling, all Motion and Action was necessary. All Beings and Attributes were of eternal Necessity  
 
Conscience, Morality were all nothing but Fate.
 
This was their Creed and this was to perfect human Nature and convert the Earth into a Paradise of Pleasure,
 
Who, and what is this Fate? He must be a Sensible Fellow. He must be a Master of Science. He must be Master of Spherical Trigonometry and Great Circle Sailing. He must calculate Eclipses in his head by Intuition. He must be Master of the Science of Infinitessimal “Le Science des infiniment petits,” He must involve and extract all the Roots by Intuition and be familiar with all possible or imaginable Sections of the Cone. He must be a Master of Arts Mechanical and imitative. He must have more Eloquence than Demosthenes, more Wit than Swift or Voltaire, more humour than Butler or Trumbull. And what is more comfortable than all the rest, he must be good natured, for this is upon the whole a good World. There is ten times as much pleasure as pain in it.
 
Why then Should We abhor the Word God, and fall in Love with the Word Fate?

Do you see the mockery here?  Adams wasn’t using the “less than personal” word “fate” as a reference to God.  He was saying that the “idologians” (as he would later call them) who were promoting this concept were a bunch of stupid atheists. 
 
How Frazer could possibly read this letter and think that Adams was in favor of using the word “fate” as a reference to God is beyond me, so let’s just move on to the second quote in Frazer’s statement.  This second quote is taken from another letter in the same series in which Adams and Jefferson were discussing the errors of the French philosophes. 
 
At this point, Adams moved their conversation into a discussion of death and the afterlife.  Adams and Jefferson both believed in an afterlife, and they thought it was ridiculous for the philosophes to propose otherwise.  A few paragraphs prior to the sentence that Frazer quoted, Adams had pointed out that the philosophes all became cowards as they saw death approaching because they did not believe in the afterlife.


Bolinbroke said “his Philosophy was not Sufficient to Support him in his last hours.” D’Alembert Said “Happy are they who have Courage, but I have none.” Voltaire the greatest Genius of them all, behaved like the greatest Coward of them all, at his death as he had like the wisest fool of them all in his Lifetime. Hume aukwardly affect to Sport away all Sober thoughts.

Then, after discussing how he would rather believe in the annihilation of the soul than experience hell himself, Adams explained that:

All Nations, known in History or in Travels have hoped, believed, an expected a future and a better State. The Maker of the Universe, the Cause of all Things, whether We call it, Fate or Chance or God has inspired this Hope. If it is a Fraud, We Shall never know it. We Shall never resent the Imposition, be grateful for the Illusion, nor grieve for the disappointment. We Shall be no more. Credat Grim, Diderot, Buffon, La Lande, Condorcet, D’Holbach, Frederick Catherine; Non Ego. Arrogant as it may be, I Shall take the Liberty to pronounce them all, Idiologians. Yet I would not persecute a hair of their Heads. The World is wide enough for them and me.

Notice that he is still talking about the French philosophes.  The sentence with the list of names begins with the Latin word credat (believe) and ends with the Latin phrase non Ego (not I).  Adams was here saying that these men believed that the hope of an afterlife was a fraud, but he did not. 
 
He believed that the afterlife was real, and one of the evidences of that hope was the fact that belief in the afterlife was so widespread among the nations of men.  Men of every nation, claimed Adams, believe in an afterlife regardless of what they believe about creation.  Regardless of whether they believe that the world was created by God or by fate or by chance, men of all nations hold to the belief in an afterlife. 
 
Frazer would have us believe that Adams used the word “fate” as a reference to God, but once again we see that Adams was not using this word to convey his own opinions.  Adams was referring to the beliefs of others regarding the afterlife.  He was saying that even fatalists who reject the idea of God and believe that everything is determined by fate still believe in an afterlife.  The only exceptions that he noted to this nearly universal belief were the French philosophes whom he derided as “idiologians.”

Navigation:
Part 1

Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

You can help support Increasing Learning by browsing through our Red Bubble store. 
We offer a unique blend of spiritual, witty, nostalgic, and just plain fun designs.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us