Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us

Why I Will not be Joining the New Federalist Party

3/29/2017

4 Comments

 
Picture
I was interested in the new Federalist Party, and I offered to help them craft a position on abortion to add to their platform. That was back in January, and I never even received a response. Today, I decided to search their website for the term "abortion" to see if any of my ideas had been incorporated. What I found instead was an unfortunate reason to oppose this new party that seemed to have so much potential.

As part of their answer to the question "Why start a new party rather than apply our strategy to a preexisting one?" The Federalist Party included this statement about abortion:

"It would be easier to apply our strategy to a smaller (or new) party than for one that has allowed itself to be tainted by stances on abortion..."

This explains why the Federalist Party never responded to my offer to help them craft a platform position on abortion. They don't want their platform to be "tainted" by such issues. I suppose that if this were 1850 instead of 2017, this party would not want their platform to be "tainted" by a position on the issue of slavery either.

One of my primary complaints against the Republican Party is that they consistently and sometimes even vehemently refuse to follow the position against abortion that is contained in their platform. How could I possibly be comfortable joining a party that prefers to take no position at all on the government sanctioned murder of 3,000 children every day?

I don't care how many other issues the Federalist Party gets right, and I don't care how successful they are in growing their party. The fact that they refuse to take a stand against abortion is a deal breaker for me. I will not be joining this new party.


By the way, here is the position on abortion that I recommended to the new Federalists:

Are Prenatal Children Entitled to the Equal Protection of Persons Under the Law?
 
Yes.  The right to life is an unalienable right, and that necessarily means that it is present with every human being regardless of whether we recognize that right or not.  The slavery which was practiced in our nation’s past was wrong – not because the government eventually said that it was wrong.  Slavery was wrong because the slaves were human beings, and thus they had an inherent right to liberty regardless of whether the government recognized that right or not.  As human beings, each and every slave had a right to liberty from the moment that he came into existence.  Our government failed in its duty to protect that right, but the right itself was always there.
 
The right to life is just as much an inalienable right as the right to liberty.  The abortion that our nation currently practices is wrong – not because we say that it is wrong.  Abortion is wrong because prenatal children are human beings, and thus they have an inherent right to life regardless of whether the government recognizes that right or not.  As human beings, each and every prenatal child has a right to life from the moment that he comes into existence.  Our government has failed in its duty to protect that right, but the right itself is still there.
 
Some may ask: What about the hard cases like abortions for rape, incest or to save the life of the mother?  Once we realize that the prenatal child has the same unalienable right to life as a born child, it becomes much easier to determine what to do in these “hard cases.”  Any solution that would be wrong to apply to a born child would be wrong to apply to a prenatal child. 
 
For example:  to kill a born child because his father was a rapist would be murder, thus to kill a prenatal child because his father was a rapist is also murder.  Therefore, abortion cannot be permitted in cases of rape.  To kill a born child because his great uncle is also his father would be murder.  Thus, to kill a prenatal child because his great uncle is also his father would also be murder.  Therefore, abortion cannot be permitted in cases of incest.  The solution to these two “hard cases” is immediately apparent once we realize that the prenatal child has the same unalienable right to life as a born child.
 
But what about those cases in which the mother’s life is in danger?  We can apply the same reasoning in these cases as well.  If a doctor has two patients and there is a possibility that one of them will die at some point in the near future, it would be murder for him to kill one of his patients now in order to lower the potential of his other patient dying in the future.  Thus, to kill a prenatal child simply because there is a possibility that his mother will die if the pregnancy continues would also be murder. 
 
On the other hand, if a doctor is in a triage situation where he has more than one patient in immediate danger of death, his duty is not to save the life of every patient but rather to do his best to save as many as he can.  He cannot kill any patient in such a situation, but he is not held guilty of murder if one of his patients dies while he is saving the life of another.  Thus, if a pregnant woman’s life is in immediate danger, her doctor can administer necessary medical aid which does not involve him killing the prenatal child.  If the doctor is only able to save one of the two lives, then he is not guilty of murder.
 
Every human being – both those that have been born and those that are still within the womb – has an unalienable right to life.  Our government has a duty to protect that right to life.  Therefore, all prenatal children are entitled to the equal protection of persons under the law.
4 Comments
Adam
7/2/2017 07:29:47 pm

I'm part of the Federalist Party and they have a clear Pro-life position as part of one of their 3 primary platform planks for the national party. I would not be part of it otherwise.

Reply
Bill Fortenberry
7/3/2017 03:53:32 am

Do you have a link to that platform, Adam? Shortly after I wrote this article the party removed their platform from their website, and it is still not available at thefederalistparty.org. Also since writing this article, I have been contacted by several leaders in the party assuring me that they are working on a pro-life plank for their platform, and I assured them that I would give the party a second consideration once that plank has been added.

Reply
James Silberman
10/4/2017 10:32:08 pm

Mr. Fortenberry,

It's possible I'm mistaken, but I believe you misread the article. Here's the link so you can re-read it. http://thefederalistparty.org/2016/11/07/start-new-party-rather-apply-strategy-preexisting-one/

Here's the excerpt you refer to.

"The Libertarian Party has reached its peak in membership due to painting itself into a corner with its platform. We can see this very clearly in the 2016 election. With the two abysmal choices in the major parties, there is absolutely zero reason why the Libertarians shouldn’t be polling over 20%. They don’t because they’ve built a stigma with their platform. It would be easier to apply our strategy to a smaller (or new) party than for one that has allowed itself to be tainted by stances on abortion, drugs, religious liberties, and convention strip teases."

The article is referring to the Libertarian Party tainting itself with bad stances on abortion, not the Republican Party. The Libertarian Party's official national platform is strongly pro-abortion. The Federalist Party, as far as I can tell, is adamant in their anti-abortion stance.

Here is an article specifically addressing the issue: http://thefederalistparty.org/2017/08/15/life-of-the-party-federalism-and-abortion/

God bless,

James

Reply
Bill Fortenberry
10/5/2017 04:21:31 am

Thank you, James. As I noted in my comment to Adam above, I was contacted by several leaders in the Federalist Party who assured me that they were working on a pro-life plank for the party. I am glad to see that they have now made a public statement in favor of prenatal personhood and the abolition of abortion.

I think that the position expressed in their "Life of the Party" article is a good position on the issue of abortion (though I think that they still need to work on the section regarding exceptions), and I am looking forward to helping the Federalist Party achieve their goal of ending the American holocaust.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

You can help support Increasing Learning by browsing through our Red Bubble store. 
We offer a unique blend of spiritual, witty, nostalgic, and just plain fun designs.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us