Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us

Why I am a Young Earth Creationist - Part 7: Carboniferous Flowers

3/31/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
In October of 2009, the journal Science published a ground breaking article by P. Sargent Bray and Ken B. Anderson bearing the exciting title of “Identification of Carboniferous (320 Million Years Old) Class Ic Amber.”  Well, maybe that doesn’t sound all that exciting after all, but it should.  You see, this article presents evidence which turns the theory of plant evolution completely upside down.

As you can see in this chart from the Encyclopedia Britannica, the standard theory of plant evolution has flowering plants or angiosperms arriving on the scene very recently within the past 130 million years of Earth’s history.  Conifers (also known as gymnosperms), on the other hand, are dated back to 360 million years ago while seedless plants are supposed to have arisen about 410 million years ago.  If this chart is correct, then we would not expect to find any evidence of flowering plants in rocks that are dated to be more than 300 million years old, but that is exactly what Bray and Anderson presented in their 2009 article.


Picture
What Bray and Anderson discovered were small pieces of amber inside coal that had been dated to be 320 million years old.  This amber was subjected to mass spectrometry testing to determine its chemical makeup, and it was discovered that this supposedly 320 million year old amber was from a flowering plant.  This should not be possible if the timeline of plant evolution is correct, but Bray and Anderson very thoroughly documented that this amber had chemical properties that are only found in amber from flowering plants. 

Of course, to accept that this is evidence of a flaw in timeline of plant evolution would be scientific heresy, so Bray and Anderson were quick to denounce their own findings in the conclusion of the article.  They wrote:

The observation of Class Ic ambers in Carboniferous sediments suggests that preconifer gymnosperms were using complex polyterpenoid resin in a manner similar to that seen in a wide variety of modern species … Our data do not imply that angiosperms existed in the Carboniferous, because the fossil record does not record unequivocal angiosperm fossils until the Cretaceous.

Let me translate that into common English for you:

The discovery of amber from flowering plants in 320 million year old rock suggests that non-flowering plants used to produce amber that is identical to the amber from flowering plants.  This must be true because the theory of evolution tells us that flowering plants did not exist 320 million years ago, and we know that the theory of evolution cannot be false.

And in case you think that I am being too harsh with this particular translation, let me suggest that you read David Grimaldi’s analysis which was published in the same issue of Science as Bray and Anderson’s article.  Grimaldi admits that:

the most remarkable aspect of the newly discovered Carboniferous amber is that it has a molecular composition that has been seen only from angiosperms.

And he says that:

Resins are so diverse that those from each plant species have a distinctive ... fingerprint that can be used to identify the plants that produced various ambers around the world.

But he refuses to put these two admissions together to come to the obvious conclusion that the amber found by Bray and Anderson actually was produced by a flowering plant.  To do this would contradict everything that he believes about the theory of plant evolution, so in order to preserve his theory, he rejected the obvious conclusion by saying:

In any case, this 320-million-year-old amber is certainly not from angiosperms, which arose almost 200 million years later. Thus, this amber casts perplexing new insight into the molecular characterization of amber.

And he concluded instead that:

The discovery by Bray and Anderson reveals that resins of extremely similar molecular composition can be produced by entirely unrelated plants.

In other words, Grimaldi interpreted Bray and Anderson’s conclusions exactly as I translated that conclusion above.  He said that the amber they discovered could not possibly be from a flowering plant because that would contradict the theory of evolution.  Therefore, this amber must be evidence that non-flowering plants used to produce amber that is identical to that which is only produced by flowering plants today. 

If we set aside the bias of these scientists, however, and just look at the evidence itself, we can clearly see that there are only two viable conclusions.  Either we must conclude that flowering plants have been around for 320 million years or we have to admit that carboniferous coal really isn’t 320 million years old after all.  I’m leaning more toward the latter.  How about you?

2 Comments
Cassandra link
4/26/2014 08:53:02 am

Interesting, thanks!

Reply
Sean Killackey
2/5/2015 01:44:23 pm

I'm not what you'd call a "young earth" creationist, but I well know that Jehovah created all things. Evolution does not explain, nor can it, how male and female evolved. (Meditate on that and you can see the complexity and the absured timing and locational position needed for both male and female to evole at the same time and same place and be compatible). I have my doubt's about Carbon14 dating, but I still view it as accurate (though there are limits, I believe 40,000 years).

I do not like the generalization (I don't think you've made it) that "old earth" creationists reject Adam or the flood, because I don't. In my mind the more important thing is to believe "God is and becomes the reward of those earnestly seeking Him."

I trust the Bible primarily because of the failure elsewhere to explain the origin of life, its candidness, its prophecies (especially about Jesus, Persia Greece and Rome,) and progressive and uniform way Yahweh explained "the seed" starting at Genese 3:15 and going to 1 Corinthians 15.

On another note you said in another article you like addressing biblical contradictions and I do too. You should see my email in the comments, perhaps you can. Email me some of your stuff and I'll email you some of mine.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

You can help support Increasing Learning by browsing through our Red Bubble store. 
We offer a unique blend of spiritual, witty, nostalgic, and just plain fun designs.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us