Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us

Bible Contradiction: II Samuel 24 vs. I Chronicles 21

1/28/2014

3 Comments

 
Picture
Earlier this week, I was asked to write a response to a contradiction that atheist Kenny Wyland lists as the “craziest biblical contradiction ever.”  Scott Burgener mentioned this same contradiction as being the “watershed moment” that led to his rejection of Christianity, and it is also included as number 434 in the Skeptics Annotated Bible “List of Contradictions” as well as in Jim Merritt’s “List of Bible Contradictions” on infidels.org.  So what is this contradiction which has attracted the attention of so many atheists?  It is the very important question of whether it was God or Satan who tempted David to take a census of the nation of Israel.

The text of this contradiction can be found by comparing II Samuel 24:1 with I Chronicles 21:1.  Here are the two verses in question:

And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.  (II Samuel 24:1)

And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.  (I Chronicles 21:1)

As you can see, the first passage says that it was God who moved David to take a census, but the second passage claims that this was done by Satan.  According to the atheists, this is an airtight case against the divine inspiration of the Bible.  Surely, God wouldn’t tell one author to write that He was the one who did this and then tell another author many years later that it was Satan who did it.  Such a bold contradiction could only happen if the two books were written by human authors who simply disagreed on who was responsible for David’s action.  At least, that’s what the atheists say.  In reality, however, these passages aren’t quite the smoking gun that atheists claim they are. 

To understand what is happening in these two passages, we need to turn to a similar event which took place when God decided to punish Ahab for the wickedness that he had brought into Israel.  This event is recorded for us in I Kings where we read:

I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left. And the LORD said, Who shall persuade Ahab, that he may go up and fall at Ramothgilead? And one said on this manner, and another said on that manner. And there came forth a spirit, and stood before the LORD, and said, I will persuade him. And the LORD said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets. And he said, Thou shalt persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so. Now therefore, behold, the LORD hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these thy prophets, and the LORD hath spoken evil concerning thee. (I Kings 22:19-23)

As you can see, this passage bears some striking similarities to the two accounts of David being moved to take a census.  God desired to punish Ahab for all of the wickedness that he had introduced into Israel, and He sought to carry out this punishment by convincing Ahab to do something to bring his own punishment upon him.  But in this account, we are given a little more detail into how God moved the king to do something wrong.  He did so by allowing a lying spirit from Satan to speak through Ahab’s false prophets and convince him that he would be victorious in battle.

This gives us a possible solution for the contradiction between II Samuel and I Chronicles in regards to David’s census.  It is possible that, when God desired to punish Israel for their wickedness, He asked in the court of Heaven for someone to volunteer to persuade David to take an illegal census of the nation.  Satan could have stood up at that time and eagerly volunteered to incite the “apple of God’s eye” in an action that would bring judgment on God’s chosen people.  In this scenario, the author of Chronicles could identify Satan as the agent of David’s temptation without contradicting the author of Samuel who wrote of God as being the agent of that temptation.   Satan could be viewed as the direct agent while God is viewed as being the indirect agent of the same act.

Of course, there are many possible objections to this interpretation the most important of which is that there is nothing in the text of II Samuel 24 or I Chronicles 21 which indicates that God and Satan shared in the agency of this particular temptation.  However, there is an example of this dual agency found in another passage of Scripture.  In first chapter of Job, we read of a conversation which took place between God and Satan:

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it. And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, Doth Job fear God for nought? Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his house, and about all that he hath on every side? thou hast blessed the work of his hands, and his substance is increased in the land. But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face. And the LORD said unto Satan, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So Satan went forth from the presence of the LORD. (Job 1:6-12)

This is an intriguing conversation on many levels, but let’s just focus on verse 11 for now.  There we see that Satan asked God to “put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath.”  Satan was asking God to be the agent of Job’s calamity, but how did God respond?  He told Satan, “all that he hath is in thy power.”  This seems to be the very same kind of dual agency that we surmised to have taken place when David was tempted to number the people of Israel.  Satan asked God to be the agent, and God responded by giving Satan direct agency over the destruction of Job’s family and possessions. 

The same type of conversation is repeated in the second chapter of Job where we read that Satan asked God to “put forth thine hand now, and touch his bone and his flesh.”  And God answered, “Behold, he is in thine hand; but save his life.”  Once again, this looks like a dual agency.  Satan is the one who was directly responsible for the attacks on Job, but God was indirectly responsible in that He is the one who gave Satan both the power and the permission to make those attacks. 

Both of these accounts seem to lend credibility to the dual agency view of II Samuel 24 and I Chronicles 21, but there is a small phrase in the second chapter of Job which makes this possibility nearly certain.  In verse three of that chapter, we read the following:

And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil? and still he holdeth fast his integrity, although thou movedst me against him, to destroy him without cause.

Notice the last phrase: “although thou movedst me against him, to destroy him without cause.”  This was God Himself claiming to be responsible for the calamity that had been brought against Job, but was God the direct agent of that calamity?  No, the direct agent was Satan as we can see in verse seven: “So went Satan forth from the presence of the LORD, and smote Job.”  God was not the direct agent of Job’s tribulation, but rather the indirect agent in that Satan had no power to act without God’s express permission. 

Thus, the passage in Job proves the possibility which is hinted at in I Kings.  It is certain that God sometimes uses Satan to accomplish His will by allowing Satan to be the direct agent of something that God desires to be done.  With this possibility open to us, it cannot be said that the two accounts of David’s temptation to number the people are contradictory to each other.  It is perfectly consistent with Scripture to conclude that God acted as the indirect agent and Satan as the direct agent to provoke David into conducting the illegal census. 

3 Comments
Sean
2/5/2015 01:18:54 pm

I believe the text "Satan" can mean opposer or resister. I am not certain if it reads HaSatan (lit. The Satan), but if I remember it correctly it reads simply Satan, that is to say "a resister" stood up. This means that Yahweh stood up to resist Israel to punish the 70,000 sinners. This may not work (as the scriptures say that God does not tempt or try any one with evil, but perhaps the action itself wasn't sinful on Davids part but revealed his pride and humbled him while punishing the 70,000 men, so that he didn't make David sin (David thinks he did, but just because David said it doesn't mean it is so).

Also the mentality of the many if not all the Hebrew writers is that if Yahweh let it happen he caused it, since all things are allowed to take place by him.

Reply
Henry Sun
3/16/2019 03:56:14 pm

As a point of fact, the reference to the lying spirit in 1 Kings 22 is not said to come from Satan. In fact, I know if no reference to Satan in any form in 1-2 Kings.

Your solution, therefore, presumes something that the text of 1 Kings 22 does not support.

Reply
Edwidge Sejour-Gonzalez
2/1/2023 05:43:03 am

Thank you, B. Fortenberry for your article!

Henry Sun,

If what the author says relating to 1Kings 22 is presumption, as you say, would that not be a rather safe one, for from where else could a 'lying spirit' come?

Please consider ...

On the Devil ...

Jn 8:44 (Messiah to His contextual audience) - You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar and the father of lies.

On the Most High Elohim/God ...

Num 23:19 - God is not a man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind. Does He speak and not act? Does He promise and not fulfill?

1 Sam 15:29 - Also the Glory of Israel will not lie or change His mind; for He is not a man that He should change His mind.”

Heb 6:18 - ... so that by two unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we who have taken refuge would have strong encouragement to take hold of the hope set before us.

(These verses, pertaining to the topic, are not exhaustive.)

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    The KJV
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us