Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us

What Senator Howard Really Said About the Fourteenth Amendment

6/9/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
When Senator Jacob Howard explained the Fourteenth Amendment's citizenship clause, he said: "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States."

Most people today read this statement and assume Howard was listing four separate categories of people who would not receive birthright citizenship:

  1. Foreigners
  2. Aliens
  3. People who belong to families of ambassadors
  4. Foreign ministers

This interpretation has shaped decades of constitutional debate, but it's based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how Howard structured his sentence.

Testing the List Theory

There's a simple way to check whether a sentence actually contains a list. In English, when you have items separated by commas in a list, you can break the sentence apart into separate sentences for each item in the list, and they should all make sense.

Take this example: "Bob is wearing his hat, coat, and boots." You can split this into three separate sentences:

  1. Bob is wearing his hat.  
  2. Bob is wearing his coat.
  3. Bob is wearing his boots.

Each one works perfectly, which confirms it's a genuine list.

What Happens When We Test Howard's Statement

Let's try the same test on Senator Howard's words. If he really meant to list four categories, we should be able to create four sentences that all make sense:

  1. This will not include persons born in the United States who are foreigners.
  2. This will not include persons born in the United States who are aliens.
  3. This will not include persons born in the United States who are who belong to the families of ambassadors.
  4. This will not include persons born in the United States who are foreign ministers.

The problem jumps out immediately in sentence three: "who are who belong to the families of ambassadors." This isn't proper English. The phrase is grammatically incorrect, and an accomplished nineteenth-century orator like Senator Howard would never have spoken this way.

This test proves that Howard wasn't creating a list of four different categories.

Understanding the Real Grammar

So what was Howard actually doing? He was using a grammatical construction called an appositive, where one word clarifies or restates another. In nineteenth-century English, the appositive was a common and sophisticated way to ensure precision.

In Howard's statement, "aliens" is an appositive for "foreigners"—he's using both terms to refer to the same group of people, not two different groups. The legal term "aliens" clarifies what he means by "foreigners."

The phrase "who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers" then describes which specific foreigners/aliens he's talking about.

A Modern Example

Here's a similar sentence that shows the same structure: "The team consisted of several teenagers, adolescents, who belonged to the parents or guardians watching from the bleachers."

No one would think this describes four different groups. We understand that "adolescents" is just another word for "teenagers," and the rest tells us which teenagers—the ones whose parents are in the stands.

Howard's sentence follows exactly the same pattern.

What Senator Howard Actually Said

When you read it with proper grammar, Howard's statement means: "This will not include persons born in the United States who are foreigners (that is, aliens) who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers."

He's describing one specific group: children born in America to foreign diplomatic families. That's it. Not multiple broad categories, but one narrow exception based on diplomatic immunity.

Why This Distinction Matters

The difference between these two interpretations is enormous for constitutional law. The misreading suggests the Fourteenth Amendment contains several broad exceptions to birthright citizenship. The correct reading shows just one specific exception for diplomatic families.

This affects how we understand the amendment's scope and intent. The framers of the amendment didn’t create a narrow category of citizens with multiple exclusions—they were acknowledging a single established principle of international law regarding diplomatic immunity.

How the Mistake Happened

The misinterpretation stems from reading nineteenth-century sentences with twenty-first-century assumptions. Modern readers expect simple, direct constructions and assume that commas always separate list items. But nineteenth-century writers used more complex structures that served different grammatical functions.

Howard wasn't being unclear or overly complicated. He was writing in the sophisticated style that educated people of his era considered normal and precise. The problem isn't with his sentence—it's with our unfamiliarity with his grammatical conventions.

Click here for a detailed analysis of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction."

And click here to purchase my book The Birthright: A History of Citizenship in America where I use original source documents to trace the history of birthright citizenship all the way back to George Washington's administration.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    The KJV
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    June 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Speaking
  • Free Resources
  • Contact Us