Increasing Learning
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us

Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment

11/5/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture

The question of birthright citizenship has received a lot of attention lately.  President Trump’s announcement that he was considering an executive order to deny citizenship to the children of illegal aliens sent many Americans searching for either a defense or a refutation of the President’s decision.  Most of the resulting discussions and debates have centered around two documents that have, not surprisingly, been hastily mishandled by parties on both sides of the debate.  Those two documents are the records of the Senate debate over the 14th Amendment as published by the Congressional Globe and the opinion of the Supreme Court in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark.  In this article, we will examine both of these documents to see whether they support or reprove President Trump’s intentions.

The Text of the Amendment 

The actual section of law being discussed in regards to President Trump’s announcement is Section 1 of the 14th Amendment which reads as follows:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

The primary point of contention regarding the application of this Amendment to the children illegal aliens is the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”  Those in favor of the President’s intention claim that illegal aliens are not subject to the jurisdiction of America and that, consequently, this phrase exempts illegal aliens from the birthright citizenship provision of this section.  This claim is founded primarily on the view that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude the children of those immigrants who had no intention of becoming citizens.  Those who disagree with President Trump claim that this phrase was solely intended to exclude the children of foreign emissaries.  Thus, our analysis of the two documents just mentioned will focus on providing a clear understanding of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”
 
As we begin our study, however, it is important to recognize that this phrase is not the only time that the term “jurisdiction” is used within Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.  The same term is used at the end of the section where it is declared that no state has the right to “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”  This repetition of the same term within the same section should indicate that it carries the same meaning in both usages.  Whatever definition we apply to the term “jurisdiction” in the first sentence of this section must also be applied to the term “jurisdiction” in the final sentence of the section.


The Debate in the Senate - Sen. Howard's Previous Remarks
The Debate in the Senate - Sen. Wade's Proposal
The Debate in the Senate - Sen. Howard's Amendment
The Debate in the Senate - Complete Jurisdiction

The Debate in the Senate - More on Complete Jurisdiction
The Debate in the Senate - Sovereignty Over the Soil
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - British Citizenship
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - Justice Story on Allegiance
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - The Claims of the Judicial Branch
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - Rejection of Jus Sanguinis
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - The Slaughterhouse Cases
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof
U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark - Opinions of the Executive Branch
More Posts Coming Soon...
1 Comment
George McConnell link
8/24/2019 07:31:34 am

Person under jurisdiction of the State does not imply illegal and does speak to citizens ..they are state citizens as well as US citizens.

The thrust of the law is to define itself to US citizens not illegals as they are not subject to the same legal intent. Intention is what's important here, in my opinion.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture
    Bill Fortenberry is a Christian philosopher and historian in Birmingham, AL.  Bill's work has been cited in several legal journals, and he has appeared as a guest on shows including The Dr. Gina Show, The Michael Hart Show, and Real Science Radio.

    Contact Us if you would like to schedule Bill to speak to your church, group, or club.

    "Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning." (Proverbs 9:9)

    Search


    Topics

    All
    Abortion
    American History
    Apologetics
    Archaeology
    Atonement
    Benjamin Franklin
    Bible
    Bible Contradiction
    Buddhism
    Calvinism
    Children
    Christmas
    Citizenship
    Coaching
    Context
    Covid
    Creation
    Debate
    Doctrine
    Evolution
    Geography
    Government
    Homosexuality
    Immigration
    Islam
    James Wilson
    John Adams
    Marriage
    Masks
    Meditation
    Morality
    Mormonism
    Open Theism
    Parenting
    Politics
    Sacrifice
    Sam Harris
    Science
    Self Defense
    Self-Defense
    Slavery
    Solon
    Soteriology
    Strategy
    Tactical Faith
    Textual Criticism
    Theology
    Vaccines
    Video

    Archives

    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    RSS Feed

You can help support Increasing Learning by browsing through our Red Bubble store. 
We offer a unique blend of spiritual, witty, nostalgic, and just plain fun designs.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Public Speaking
  • Contact Us